Tessa Johanna Brockmann vs Nellie Taraba Wallberg Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 14 May at 01:58 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Johanna Brockmann vs N. Taraba Wallberg

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win

SWE
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Brockmann 1 - 0 Wallberg
They have played 2 sets in total, with Tessa Johanna Brockmann winning 2 and Nellie Taraba Wallberg winning 0. The last match between Tessa Johanna Brockmann and Nellie Taraba Wallberg was at the W35 Bastad, 14-05-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Tessa Johanna Brockmann getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Brockmann | 1 |
Wallberg | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 Bastad(05-14-25)
T. J. Brockmann vs N. T. Wallberg H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$1,915 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
61.84% (94-58) | Career Total W/L | 52.27% (23-21) |
1 | Clay | 0 |
4 | Titles | 0 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-2) |
T. J. Brockmann vs N. T. Wallberg Match Preview:
- How does recent second serve performance compare? Brockmann has a clear advantage, winning 41.36% of points compared to Wallberg's 29.89%, an indicator often linked with match outcomes.
- What about return games? Brockmann edges out Wallberg on opponent's second serve returns with 53.6% over 52.69%, although Wallberg has a slight lead on first serve returns at 35.83% to Brockmann’s 33.92%.
- When it comes to handling pressure, Brockmann has a superior breakpoint save percentage of 50%, significantly higher than Wallberg's 36.67%.
- In terms of overall performance, Brockmann's win rate over the last year stands at 57.81%, well above Wallberg's 33.33% win rate.
- On surface preferences, Brockmann shows a higher win percentage on Hard courts with 60%, whereas Wallberg performs best on Clay with a 48% win rate.
- Analyzing player level, Brockmann has been active at higher-level tournaments with a 56.76% win rate, while Wallberg has participated mainly in lower-tier events, holding a 50% win rate.
- Both players face differing opponent strengths; Brockmann's opponents rank averaged at 375.53, comparatively lower than Wallberg's 323.17.
- In deciding sets, Brockmann appears more consistent with a 60% win rate compared to Wallberg's 50%.
- What about breakpoint conversion? Wallberg excels here, converting 58.82% of opportunities versus Brockmann’s 45.71%, which is key in critical moments.
Editorial Prediction (May 14, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match shows Brockmann with a distinct advantage in several areas, particularly in second serve performance and their ability to maintain composure under pressure. These aspects are often pivotal in determining match outcomes.
While Wallberg demonstrates strength in breakpoint conversion, Brockmann’s superior win rate on hard surfaces and higher level of competition faced should serve them well.
Considering these factors, Brockmann appears likely to secure victory in this encounter, given their consistent performance and strengths across key metrics.
Tessa Johanna Brockmann vs Nellie Taraba Wallberg Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. J. Brockmann vs N. T. Wallberg H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 5 |
1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
2 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
1:10:21 | Average Match Time | 1:10:21 |
67% (31/46) | 1st Serve % | 63% (37/59) |
77% (24/31) | 1st Serve Win % | 51% (19/37) |
40% (6/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 32% (7/22) |
42% (5/12) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (1/1) |
56% (33/59) | Return Points Win % | 35% (16/46) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. J. Brockmann Recent Matches Played
N. T. Wallberg Recent Matches Played

T. J. Brockmann vs N. T. Wallberg Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
61.84% (94/58) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.27% (23/21) |
58.97% (207/144) | Sets Win/Loss | 50.49% (52/51) |
53.68% (1772/1529) | Games Win/Loss | 49.80% (490/494) |
60.00% (21/14) | Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
63.27% (62/36) | Clay Win/Loss | 54.05% (20/17) |
57.89% (11/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 42.86% (3/4) |
0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
228 | Aces Total | 60 |
0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
447 | Total Double Faults | 125 |
1:39:45 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
375.16 | Average Opponent Rank | 284.68 |
59% (5393/9081) | 1st Serve % | 60% (1597/2666) |
62% (3327/5393) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (925/1597) |
47% (1748/3688) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (460/1069) |
50% (564/1134) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 53% (166/313) |
47% (4285/9169) | Return Points Win % | 47% (1174/2487) |
0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
50.00% (1/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
57.50% (46/34) | Challenger W/L | 55.17% (16/13) |
67.14% (47/23) | Futures W/L | 53.85% (7/6) |
63% (93/148) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (23/43) |
0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
62% (28/45) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (5/11) |
61% (30/49) | Deciding Set Win % | 63% (10/16) |
87% (90/78) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (18/16) |
13% (90/12) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (18/2) |
26% (62/16) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (26/7) |